I accept your claim that 1MW in an un-ventilated, insulated room would be fatal.
But that is not the case : a 30,000 CPM is sufficient to ventilate it, and there is a fan (of similar dimensions to one particular example) on the roof. (Plus convective loss, which would reduce the need for ventilation). Rossi presented no calorimetric data to Lewan (see my separate thread), except to note that he discounted the heat needed to bring the return water to boiling point. Rossi filed his contract with IH with the court. See sections 3(c) and 5 Rossi says (and will presumably produce in court) that IH agreed to the ERV's technical specification and procedure (with modifications they requested). Rossi says (and will presumably produce in court) that IH and JM signed off on a strict separation (double-black-box) policy. There is NO evidence at all that ERV Penon is "Rossi's" man. From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: "vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 3:11:49 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal a.ashfield < a.ashfi...@verizon.net > wrote: Your claim that the heat released from the 1 MW plant would be fatal has been shot down. That was not my claim. You are making a straw-man argument. My claim was that without industrial grade ventilation, when you heat a space with 26 times more heat than is normally used in winter, and you leave the heaters on continuously without a thermostat, that space will soon be so hot it kills people. However, if there is proper ventilation, that will not happen. Therefore, in order to prove there was 1 MW of heat production, Rossi had to show the I.H. expert the ventilation equipment: the fans and ducts. The expert had to perform a conventional measurement of air temperature and flow to demonstrate that 1 MW of heat was continuously removed from the room. THAT is my claim. Do you agree or not? If not, why not? This is especially important because Rossi's own calorimetry shows no excess heat. The only way he could convince anyone is to show the customer equipment and ventilation. BQ_BEGIN Likewise, your certainty of fraud because Rossi was the one who prevented IH from visiting the customer. BQ_END Rossi was the one. He said so himself. I regard that as proof of fraud. If you do not, we have a large difference of opinion. I have several other reasons for thinking this is fraud, which I have not revealed. BQ_BEGIN Your other evidence of fraud seem to come mainly from what IH has told you. BQ_END No, it is from what Rossi himself has said, and from his calorimetric data, which shows no excess heat. I.H. played no role in my evaluation. BQ_BEGIN Before accepting that IH is a knight in shining armor who speaks only truth you should read this. BQ_END I.H. has nothing to do with it. Rossi himself provided all the proof I need that he is a fraud, mainly in his interview with Lewan. - Jed
