>From the quote, that is a conclusion that is now coming out of BLP. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Axil, are you saying that Mills' theory, which he has used to develop this > process, has now failed him and can no longer explain it? > > Craig > > > On 06/17/2016 03:38 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> R, Mills has alway asserted that the energy that he sees in his >> experiments were based on CHEMICAL processes which are driven by the >> particular characteristics of the hydrino theory. There always has been a >> correspondence between the small amount of energy produced by LENR >> experiments and the small amounts of energy produced by hydrinos. >> >> In this latest SunCell experiment, R. Mills is seeing huge quantities of >> excess power produced in these reactor meltdowns, in the megawatt range. >> There is no way that such huge amounts of power can be produced by chemical >> means. This implies that the hydrino is no longer the cause of the excess >> energy seen in these meltdowns. Something else is going on. Mills must now >> explain where all this energy is coming from if it cannot be produced by >> chemical reactions. X-rays are being generated with energies far in excess >> of any electrical input voltages. What produces these X-rays? >> >> BLP states: >> >> Proof of a new energy source is provided by two otherwise inexplicable >> observations: (i) The formation of a high-energy hydrogen plasma in the >> absence of any input electrical power, the nonexistence of any energy >> releasing chemistry with this fuel, and the further impossibility of known >> chemistry of this high energy. (ii) The emission of soft X-ray radiation at >> a voltage far less than that of the light energy produced and the inability >> of any known chemistry to release such high energy. >> > >
