Bob— Your comments are right along the lines of mine. However, I have a thought that the resonances that exist in the Ni particle lattice are important in the coupling that allows the change of potential energy of the system to phonic kinetic energy of the lattice.
My hypothesis for a reaction with added D would be to see a change in the resonances and hence the coupling conditions. More heat or less heat may be the result. The pathway of mobile H in the Ni lattice would also change with addition of D, given its added mass and would change the electric field seen by the average H+. This would also change the wave length of the H+ and associated coupling resonances necessary for the LENR. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10y From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 5:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation Bob, This is exactly the type of experiment I had in mind. Add about 10% LAD to the LAH and re-run the series of experiments to see how the XH compares to plain LAH. You are also correct that this may tell us a lot about what reaction is occurring. It has been held by many LENR researchers that LENR cannot be obtained with H, only with D. They claim that the XH produced in Ni-H reactions is really reaction with the residual D in the naturally isotopic H (0.0156 atomic %). If when adding 10% LAD (a D increase of 640x) you get much more heat, it would support evidence for the theory that it was only the D that was reacting. If you do not get much more heat, then either: 1) only the H is reacting, or 2) as Dennis Letts describes, the reaction is confined to NAE and there are not enough NAE to support reaction with the greater amount of D. That is why I asked AP the question about tests with added D. Based on his response, I have suggested to Mathieu Valat that he share his LAD with AP. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Bob H— > > > > Why not do an experiment with a small concentration of D to determine > whether or not it changes the repeatable reaction (with normal H). It may > be a little D does poison the reaction. Getting rid of all the D may be > the ticket to higher energy production. Such information may also help > understanding the Ni system geometry and other physical properties that are > important for the reaction to occur. > > > > Bob Cook >
