You should be able to see my gmail address. I see yours.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > You didn't look good enough. > > I have a PhD in Physics. My original field of expertise was astrophysics > and in particular gravitational waves. Half of my dissertation was on > astrophysics of neutron stars (so I know 1 or 2 things about nuclear > reactions) and the other was on improving signal detection of gravitational > waves detectors. I come up with a new way of using resonant bars to > increase signal to noise ratio. This second part of my dissertation was > mostly engineering. > > I have taught physics at the college level (a lot of my students were > engineers) , won NASA grants to send stratospheric payload (again mostly > engineering problems) and continued to work on data analysis for the last > 25 years. > > I eventually switched field and went to neuroscience. I'm a researcher at > Northwestern but I work in the modelling and data analysis of EEG that is > an imminently physics and engineering problem. > I have a patent pending invention that is based on Phase Locked Loop that > again is an engineering problem. I'm writing papers on applying > thermodynamics principles to neuroscience. I'm also launching my own > startup in the field of neurostimulation. > > So I may not have experience with industrial engineering but as you see I > have plenty of qualification to evaluate some basic physics and engineering > issues. In fact, many of the problems with Rossi statements can be > evaluated from an introductory physics point of view, no extensive > experience in any particular field is necessary. > > I resisted to use my qualification to respond to your question simply > because I really resent when people use their so called experience to win > an argument on the internet without addressing the substance of the > argument raised. It is really bad form. > > Giovanni > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 5:57 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> The only Giovanni Santostasi I saw on Google was an associate >> neuroscientist at Northwestern University working on sleep disorders. If >> that's you, you appear to have no relevant experience regarding the 1 MW >> plant. >> >> Knowing you disbelieve anything I write, here is a published footnote at >> the end of my paper on Cleaning up the Nuclear Waste at Hanford. I will >> send you a photocopy of the last page that shows it if you send me your >> email address. >> >> "Footnote >> Adrian Ashfield is collaborating with Larry Penberthy in this project. >> He previously headed engineering for Canning Town Glass in the U.K. >> Domglas in Canada. Anchor Hocking and Wheaton Industries in the U.S. >> before starting Ashfield Associates in 1981." >> >> >> >> On 8/14/2016 4:31 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: >> >> A link to a CV or linkedin takes a second. Not acceptable answer that you >> did this on the past. >> You are using your claim of experience right now. >> What is your real name? >> It is you that is using arguments from authority. Mine stand on their >> own. >> And as I said, you can google my name and see what is my experience in >> science and technology. I'm 100 times more transparent than you are. >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> I have already done so on this blog in the past. Please answer the >>> question. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8/14/2016 4:20 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: >>> >>> Besides what I have said about using "argument from authority" as a way >>> to win a debate, can you please give us a link to your CV a.ashfield? >>> Can you back up your claims to have such expertise? >>> Thanks, >>> Giovanni >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >>> gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> A.ashfield: >>>> >>>> "Ad hominem" attacks. To quote a famous immortal scene from the >>>> "Princess Bride": "You keep using that word. I don't think it means what >>>> you think it means". >>>> >>>> I didn't attack anybody at hominem. I didn't put down Penon not to have >>>> a PhD. >>>> I simply stated that Rossi saying he has a Doctorate is not true and >>>> that is at least sloppy and probably misleading. >>>> >>>> It doesn't reflect negatively on me at all. >>>> >>>> So let me reflect this back at you given you don't understand what ad >>>> hominem attack is and instead you are using your supposed experience to >>>> make an argument (and trying to disqualify my arguments too as a >>>> consequence) and therefore committing another known fallacy , i. e. >>>> "argument from authority". >>>> >>>> Giovanni >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Giovanni, >>>>> Your string of ad hominem attacks do nothing to clarify the issues and >>>>> reflect badly on you. >>>>> >>>>> I find Dr. Levi's 18 hour test of an E-Cat in 2011, without steam, >>>>> finding a COP 15 -20kW peaking at 130 kW is good proof that the E-Cat >>>>> produces considerable excess heat. As I've said, the performance of the >>>>> 1 >>>>> MW plant has yet to be proven. >>>>> >>>>> Having headed engineering for large corporations and later consulting >>>>> around the world, doing due diligence for organizations like GRI, EPRI, >>>>> OECD and the World Bank, I have considerable experience in judging people >>>>> and new technologies. >>>>> What experience do you have? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
