On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:01 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
I am not sure that I understand the point Eric. Why would any reasonable > person not want to know the real truth and not accept a possible > fabrication by the judicial system? Even though we are subject to the > court orders that does not prove that they are honest and accurate. > My point is that if you were the trustee of a lot of other people's money, and someone did the equivalent of saying, "trust me, what just happened was a 1-year 1MW test that just completed successfully," and you were not able to verify that proposition yourself to your own satisfaction, hopefully you would not give them any money. You would say, "wait a minute, that doesn't make sense. You want me to give you all that money without really believing or having a basis for believing that what you're saying is true. Sorry, no dice." This is all apart from any legal questions. It's a matter of what financially responsible behavior would look like on the part of IH. I'm arguing they shouldn't give 89 million dollars to someone unless they really believe that money is owed. Eric
