*It doesn't look like IH had a single technical person so why do you think they could have contributed anything to the plant design or operation? They ultimately hired Murray, but lacking tech expertise they hired someone with the wrong experience. Likewise, it seems that they were unable to understand if the plant was working and if it wasn't, do something about it.AA*
It doesn't matter if IH had not technical expertise. In fact, the fiduciary duty of Rossi should be even higher because of that. Besides Rossi's audience is the world, not just IH. If Rossi was not the scam that he is, he should try to convince the entire world, let alone other potential investors besides IH, that his technology is real. Doing misleading things (as noted in a interconnected web of lies), not involving his partners and investors, avoiding answering questions in a direct way, coming up with excuses after excuses and never delivering the goods should discredit Rossi for good but his ardent followers never give up no matter what idiocy Rossi does and says. By the way no matter the field of expertise Murray's questions in Exibit 5 are relevant and to the point. They are questions we all ask and Penon or Rossi never answered. Fabiani never sent the raw data even when requested to do so several times (even renouncing to be paid for his services in exchange of the raw data). Is not all this makes you suspicious (it makes me disgusted), even a little bit? Giovanni On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Jed: "Whether or not this happened, there's a more general point that > should be apparent to anyone who has had a chance to read all of the > documents filed so far. Leonardo made zero effort to involve IH in the > planning and execution of the alleged GPT, and at no point was there an > effort to persuade them of its validity. " > > It doesn't look like IH had a single technical person so why do you think > they could have contributed anything to the plant design or operation? > They ultimately hired Murray, but lacking tech expertise they hired someone > with the wrong experience. Likewise, it seems that they were unable to > understand if the plant was working and if it wasn't, do something about it. > AA > > On 8/26/2016 9:40 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Being a bit naive I would say it is not smart to clean evidences when you >> want to convince someone it works, and it is indeed working. >> > > Whether or not this happened, there's a more general point that should be > apparent to anyone who has had a chance to read all of the documents filed > so far. Leonardo made zero effort to involve IH in the planning and > execution of the alleged GPT, and at no point was there an effort to > persuade them of its validity. We are even given to understand that IH had > objected to the Doral business being construed as the GPT. This should put > anyone on notice that the territory we're in here is not normal territory > but instead Alice in Wonderland territory. If Leonardo believed that there > was a real GPT underway (not a sure thing as far as I can tell), they will > have been proceeding under the understanding that it was a purely formal > thing, to check off some check boxes. All of this is independent of the > actual manner in which the alleged GPT was carried out -- whether a shoddy > job was done, or whether it was a bona fide test demonstrating ~ 1MW power > for a year -- which one gathers is a topic of earnest debate on E-Cat World. > > More likely it seems to me is that even Rossi was not of the understanding > that the whole business in Florida was legitimately the GPT. Instead I > wonder whether the Doral activity was being conducted for reasons that were > not transparent from the lawsuit. One thought is that Rossi was putting > pressure on IH to back out of the license agreement on favorable terms, so > that he could enter into a new business arrangement unencumbered with a > more tractable business partner. IH were unwilling to do so, and so Rossi > sought various ways of raising the stakes, first acting erratically and > then going through the motions of the GPT. Perhaps he was of the > assumption that IH would want to avoid bad publicity enough not to allow > the matter to go to trial. If so, this seems like a miscalculation on his > part or a desperate endgame. > > IH may have had reasons either to continue with the license agreement, or > at least not cancel it without being reimbursed for various expenses > incurred in Florida beyond the 11.5 million they had already paid. The > terms for canceling the license agreement may have been too objectionable > to Rossi without significant modification. > > Eric > > >
