a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: I was expecting you couldn't because it's secret. > A little bird is about as solid as the rest of the speculations. >
You have a peculiar definition of the word "speculation." If I said, "I suppose Rossi did not send the flow meter back for calibration," that would be speculation. What I said was a positive assertion, not speculation. You seem to think you can recast sentences and their meanings without regard to syntax. If you do not believe me, you should say so, rather than putting words in my mouth. > Why no piping drawing, that is key to most of it? Easier to argue without > the facts? > No, the rust is the key. A drawing might be wrong, but physical evidence is proof. But how do you know these are not facts? For that matter, how do you know I have not seen a piping drawing? As I have pointed out before, you have (another!) peculiar notion which is that information you personally have not seen does not exist. - Jed
