mischugnons... I might know what they are. They have made themselves visible in the research of Keith Fredericks that can be found here:
http://restframe.com/ I have described the mischugnons as metalized hydrogen crystals and how they work, how they store GeV levels of power, how they manifest a monopole field, and how they catalyze the LENR reaction. Their description starts with Holmlid, shows how the metallic hydrogen's structure produces spin waves through hole superconductivity and whispering gallery wave, how they can store massive amounts of energy, and how that energy can be projected as monopole flux lines to catalyzed proton and neutron weak force decay to produce mesons as seen by Holmlid. Keith Fredericks calls the tachyons but they are just a monopole like quasiparticle that Holmlid and LENR reactors can created using a catalyst. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In many many experiments over the years the mischugnons have made their > presence irrefutably known. It is a thrilling time just now in cold fusion > as there are many confirmations and affirmations of the choirs existence, > we’ve been hearing their voices for nearly 30 years and just now the > theatrical smoke is beginning to clear just enough that we can see the > outlines of the choir, it’s a big one. It’s not the single voices that make > the music of the choir so wonderful it is the combination of them all. > Perhaps it is a Gregorian harmony they are singing. > > > > > > From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 3:44 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons > > > > Ok. So you've survived the stinkers and the peanut gallery and the > charlatans, the high priests, the prelates and the faithful of physics. In > your own experiments you've seen muons or mischugenon. > > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What is interesting is that the real data has always shone most brightly > even when the signal was incredibly poorly understood. That’s the benefit of > longevity and dedication the real shining bits tend to agglomerate into an > understandable thing. Such is the case it seems with Holmlid’s ‘muons’, > there are too many coincidences coming together to ignore his contributions > to what is becoming a choir. > > > > What are those coincidences that lead one inevitably to the conclusion that > Holmlid is seeing muons, and that he's seeing the same thing you believe > you've been seeing? You speak with enough confidence to lead me to believe > that you've read his work, are quite familiar with it and are able to > support your position with concrete details. > > > > As for being the tutor or free simple sound-bite tour-guide sorry I have > neither the time nor inclination to help the reluctant. There is so much to > do and so little time to do it. As Thomas Edison so aptly put it long ago, > “The thing I lose patience with most is the clock, its hands move too fast.” > > > > Alas it's not for my edification that you should answer these questions. > It's for your own credibility! You've taken on the position that Holmlid is > seeing muons or mischugenon. You should now give support for that position. > > > > Eric > >
