The trueism suggested is based on two- bodied interactions where large energy releases are the norm.
It is obvious that6 that “trueidm” does not appl,y to LENR. Small changes within a many-bodied coherent system are the LENR norm. Many different nuclear changes apparently become possible within the many-bodied system. IIMHO this includes nuclear species changes that involve aonly small changes in total potential; energy of the coherent system. Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 12:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20 On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:51 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: It seems to have become a truism that any change in the nuclear domain must involve an energy change that is orders of magnitude greater than an energy in the chemical domain. However, based on my reading of nuclear isomers there are few known instances where this truism does not hold. Since there is also great deal that is not known about nuclear isomers, chemical like energy changes might be even more common the nuclear domain. In the context of the Narayanaswamy claim, nuclear isomers will not explain a nuclear transition such as X -> Fe. Isomeric transitions involve a transition from an excited state of an element to a less excited state, or to the ground state, e.g., 180mTa -> 180Ta + gamma. Narayanaswamy reports that he is seeing "excess" iron, i.e., iron that it is coming from something else. Eric
