They are fatalist instead of defeatist. Harry
Craig Haynie wrote: >> The URL is difficult to enter, and the article is short and mainly quotes, >> so I will take the liberty of uploading it. As Chris Zell says, it is >> sadly defeatist. > > If they are honest conclusions, then how can they be considered 'defeatist'? > That word implies a preconceived conclusion. > > Craig Haynie (Houston) >
