Yes, but it would be better if that document could be downloaded and/or referenced from a goverment site. I searched and couldn't find any official reference. If it's an unclassified document, it must be published by the agency that unclassified it. In my opninion, if this reference is not presented, an skeptic can still argument, with a reasonable level of doubt, that the document is a fake/it's not official.
Best regards, Mauro > > > They have been trumped by a government document and know their previous > positions are now all compromised. They built a house of cards and here > comes the wind  :_) > > -Fran > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Esa Ruoho" <esaru...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 1:27:01 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hilarious response to DIA paper in Wikipedia > > endless fun. where's my rubber mallet so i can hit my forehead with it > continuously > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jed Rothwell < jedrothw...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > In a way, ya gotta love these people! See: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cold_fusion#U.S._Defense_Intelligence_Agency_document > > - Jed > > >
