Jed you are a good historian too...in which extent was the airplane patented? The aspects that had been not patented belong to KNOW what, HOW, why. The same situation can be apllied to this new energy source. Interesting developments.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: > > I'd allow Rossi to make all kinds of suggestions, but not to touch the >> device, nor would I allow anyone affiliated with Rossi to get anywhere near >> it. > > > Such tests have been done, and they are underway now. Rossi is another > city. > > > >> Rossi claims, though, that only he knows the secrets of the device. Am I >> correct about that? >> > > Incorrect. Other people know the secrets. > > Rossi is a strange fellow but he is better than you think, and his claims > are more solid than they appear. It would be a grave mistake to judge his > work based on his personal credibility. > > Someone here remarked that Focardi "forced" Rossi to do the demo. That's > incorrect. Rossi wanted to delay but he is very fond of Focardi, and Focardi > asked him to go ahead in January, so he did as a favor. It would have been a > better demo if they had rehearsed a few more weeks, but it wasn't all that > bad. As I said, it is difficult to do a demo of this nature with so many > people in attendance, and with an unpredictable prototype. The fact that the > thing did not work and then worked marginally and not as well as it did the > day before tells me that it is probably real. This is how cold fusion > devices behave. A fake machine would work perfectly. > > - Jed > >
