Dear Mike, As regarding heat after death in classical CF it was rather rare- I cannot remember more than 5 documented cases. Surely the Piantelli Cells and the E-cats have to be heated and stimulated to start. When I am thinking or writing about the Ecat I imagine that I am using one instead of my home Bosch gas burner for heating and warm water. We still have to learn much about the E-cats. The Defkalion Press Conference next week will be an opportunity, those nice people have to manufacture and sell the units, fast enough to be profitable and depend on real customers.They have my deepest empathy. Peter
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Mike Carrell <mi...@medleas.com> wrote: > Dear Peter,**** > > Rossi is dancing again. In CF it is called ‘heat after death’, but an > energy investment is needed to elevated the cell into a operating region. > Thereafter, with proper insulation, the reaction can continue indefinitely, > against the cooling effect of phase conversion of water to steam. Randy > conceived of a similar situation for one of his solid catalyst systems. If > the E-Cat reaction has an inherent variability, managing a reactor array > could be exciting, one might say. Such is an aspect of “commecializability” > and can be a black hole for money in the attempt for 1 MW.**** > > ** ** > > Warmest Regards,**** > > Mike**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:28 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy**** > > ** ** > > Stimulating is good, negative stimulents as Steve's reaction**** > > are better, it seems. (No more tests, who said it?) **** > > ** ** > > We had the opportunity to observe that the E-cat has quite sharp verbal > claws, not always retracted.**** > > ** ** > > Let's hope there will be energetically independent greater E-cats. **** > > ** ** > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa < > shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> wrote:**** > > Hello group, > > Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info: > > * * * > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12#comment-46906 > > Dear C.Monti: > Thanks for your smart insight. > About the question: in these days we are making tests with zero energy > input, to try to make them safe. Probably we are close. The day before > yesterday a new Cat worked for one hour producing 15 kWh/h without energy > input, then I had to stop mit because it was continuing to raise energy > output. Anyway: yes, we have a power back up if grid goes black out. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > * * * > > When people start doubting, release new unexpected info. > > It appears Rossi is now close to producing 15 kW E-Cat devices that can > reliabily work with no input energy. Magnificent! Now, let's hope he will > soon be able to show one of them to the public for a reasonably long amount > of time. That would be the conclusive proof of validity. > > Cheers, > S.A.**** > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck**** > > Cluj, Romania**** > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com**** > > ** ** > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department.**** > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
