> From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint > > Why doesn't Mills FINISH JUST ONE PRODUCT AND GET IT TO MARKET! > He's like a little kid who gets 90% done with something and then gets > bored > with it and is off to some new and challenging puzzle... never > completing > what he starts. > > The only other explanation is that he's not able to get his technology > working reliably in order to make it commercially viable... perhaps due > to a flawed theory which, if religiously held to, hampers engineering > optimization instead of helping... Can't build a house on a crooked > foundation.
Well that has been one explanation. Many have wondered about that. OTOH, to be fair to BLP, it's my understanding that the facility is not financially structured to creating prototypes for industry and consumers. Just proof-of-concept experimental devices that aren't in their own right something that can be commercialized - not without a lot of expensive R&D engineering involved. BLP doesn't possess sufficient cash reserves for that kind of operation. It's through the licensing of their research findings that they hope to cash in when others sign up with licensing fees and subsequently start paying royalties. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
