Alain, I am trying to find minimal semi-classical models for W-L theory. Quantum W-L theory requires intense local e-m fields.
Metallic nano-structures can super-focus coulomb and magnetic fields. Surface probes show huge amplifications at nano-sized "hotspots" - even after 2-Dimensional filtering which smudges and attenuates peaks. Does a "hotspot" electron passing free protons (with equal, opposite momentum) or an immobile proton experience enough ampere force long enough to overcome the 780 KeV barrier, producing a ULMN? Using classical physics, the two references I cited indicate that in nanostructures, conduction electrons' momentum, inertial mass and magnetic energy can be vastly larger than in macroscopic circuits. Maybe a semi-classical analysis can yield reasonable results - if actual field strengths, charge densities, electron velocities,... are used? Are entanglement, nonlocality, Bose condenscation, ... really needed? I'm uncertain. Good data is hard to find. Thanks for the reply, Lou Pagnucco On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Alain Sepeda wrote: if you red WL theory, they say that the neutrons are generated from coherents pairs of p+e, and the result is a group of possible neutrons widely distributed among the coherents p, thus slow and delocalized a kind of schodinger cat gang most are alive, but one is dead, but nobody knows which, so the dead cat is wide, thus slow 2012/2/16 <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> > W-L LENR theory claims ultra-low momentum neutrons (ULMNs) are created > - quite surprising if due to high kinetic energy e-p collisions. > > Overcoming the electroweak effective potential barrier that repels > an electron from a proton (= udu 'quark bag') requires 780 KeV. > > Can slow (non-relativistic) electrons climb the barrier by borrowing > just enough potential magnetic (but no kinetic) energy - leaving ULMNs? > > As shown in [1], in nanowires. almost no conduction electron energy is > kinetic. Almost all is likely stored in virtual exchange photons. > > On metal hydride nano-particle surfaces, plasma electrons and protons > can oscillate in parallel and opposite directions . > -- When velocity = 0, coulomb force brings some e-p pairs together > -- as velocity increases, magnetic ampere force pinches e-p pairs closer > > Semiclassically, this increasing ampere force is equivalent to a rising > linear potential in a time-varying Schroedinger equation - Graphically: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > PLASMONIC OScILLATION: TRANSFERING 'MAGNETIC ENERGY' > > MIN PLASMON AMPLITUDE ----------------> AMPLITUDE INCREASES > MIN AMPERE FORCE ----------------> AMPERE FORCE RISES > MIN LINEAR POTENTIAL ----------------> LINEAR POTENTIAL RISES > > ^ ^ ^ ^ > . . . . > \ . \ . \ . \. > \ . \ . \ . \ e > \ . +-+ +-- \ . +-+ +- \ . +-+ +- |:+- > \ . | | | ^ \ . | | | \.e| | | |:| > \ . | | | | \ . | | | \_| | | |:| > \ . | | | | \ | | | | | |V| > \ | | |780 \ e| | | | | | | > \ | |u|KeV \_| |u| |u| |u| > \ | |d| | |d| |d| |d| --> ULMN (ddu) > \ e| |u| | |u| |u| |u| + neutrino > \_| |_| V |_| |_| |_| > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > An electron arriving at a potential wall is pushed forward by the > magnetic coupling to millions of conduction electrons and back-reacts > by borrowing some of their collective momentum (Newton's 3rd Law). > > Ref[2] shows that electrons in nanowires can acquire enormous inertial > mass from this coupling - distinct, I believe, from relavistic mass > - which may make the surface plasma appear as an extremely viscous > fluid to gamma rays, and could trap most high-energy gammas. > > > [1]"How Much of Magnetic Energy is Kinetic Energy?" - Kirk T. McDonald > http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/kinetic.pdf > > [2]"Extremely Low Frequency Plasmons in Metallic Microstructures" > http://www.cmth.ph.ic.ac.uk/photonics/Newphotonics/pdf/lfplslet.pdf > > Comments/corrections very welcome, > Lou Pagnucco
