Reliable/fusion.cal, If an experiment this simple produces He, it proves LENR.
Now, for sure, one of the objections raised would be that the He detected was mixed in with the methane - even if the Argon is used. Has anyone ruled out this possible artifact? fusion.calo...@gmail.com wrote: > Lou, > > Show this to one of your non degree tech guys working at your transducer > based instrument factory shop in N. J. : > http://www.icpig2009.unam.mx/pdf/PB13-3.pdf > > He could assemble it in an hour. Use Ar instead of He. Next day check > for He. Surprise! > > The C deposit is conical nano structure and has a trapped H within. No > need to check for excess heat. Where there is He there is Rossi Fusion. > The ECat appropriated Chan one Hydride mix and must be changed every six > months because of He build up. His attempt to get patents on Hydride > fusion ran into prior pending obstacles. Hence the rush to cheap mass > production. > > Warm Regards, > > Reliable > > > > pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: >> Abd, >> >> I intend to do some more research on this - plasmonics is pretty dicey. >> >> I'm not sure whether a nanowire has a cross-section large enough to >> scatter gammas originating at any significant distance, thoug, unless >> they >> are extremely collimated. >> >> But, I am more optimistic than you are that W-L would pass this test. >> According to the calculations in the paper I cited, the enormous >> effective >> (not relativistic) mass of those electrons make each look like a >> subatomic >> battering ram to any particle unfortunate enough to collide with one. >> >> I will try to find a local college with appropriate lab resources. >> There's a slim chance I can get it done. >> Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery. >> >> Lou Pagnucco >> >> >> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: >>> At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: >>>> Abd, >>>> >>>> Regarding the absence of gammas - >>>> ... is it reasonable to suppose that a high energy gamma would >>>> experience many (anomalously high) dissipative Compton collisions >>>> before >>>> escaping as a less energetic photon? If this is plausible, could we >>>> confirm it, by embedding a few radioactive gamma sources inside >>>> nanowires >>>> and observing whether gammas are attenuated and/or directionally >>>> scattered >>>> during current flow? >>> Gamma sources could be placed so that gammas pass through the >>> supposedly active heavy electron patches, and, if W-L theory is real, >>> drastic attenuation should be seen. That attentuation should not be >>> seen with controls. W-L theory requires 100% absorption of the gamma >>> energies that would be generated from neutron absorption, so this >>> should not be difficult to detect. >>> >>> Since Larsen patented this, it's really on him to demonstrate it. I'm >>> not about to try setting up some complex experiment just to prove a >>> wild theory wrong. >>> >>> Now, if I had a reason to believe W-L theory, if I were a proponent >>> of it, then, sure, the experiment would be very much in order. >>> >>> Widom and Larsen are raising a highly unlikely theory *without any >>> experimental evidence specifically supporting it.* >>> >>> If they published a gamma screen paper, with sufficient detail for >>> replication, and showing their own results, *then* we'd see some >>> movement on this. Until then, it's fancy pie in the sky. >>> >>> That wouldn't prove W-L theory, but a successful prediction is golden >>> for moving ahead with new science. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
