This is absolutely pathetic. We have been promised test data over and over 
again for over a year, and Defkalion has yet again provide something totally 
different. In my opinion, this is an insult to all those who have been 
following them. If they wanted to work in the "dark" they had every opportunity 
to do so, and share nothing with the public. However, they promised on multiple 
occasions not only to provide test data, but also data from the certification 
process, the identities of the testers, protocols for the experiments, and even 
live webcam footage. Yet again, they have failed to provide any of the 
MEANINGFUL material they promised to provide.

If they were polite, they would apologize for breaking their word,  just share 
nothing at all from this point on, and go black. I'd rather them do that than 
tease and taunt us with a few images with almost no explanation, after 
promising us COMPLETE AND FULLY DETAILED TEST DATA WITH LIVE VIDEO! 


They need to choose one way or the other, as far as I am concerned. Anything 
else is simply rude.

(Yes, I realize a private company does not "owe" the public anything, but in 
this case we were promised many things on multiple occasions. If they are not 
going to keep their word they need to be blunt and tell us, and go black.) 






________________________________
 From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green  Technologies
 
At 07:15 PM 5/10/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> At 04:42 PM 5/10/2012, ecat builder wrote:
>> Wow. That is a spark plug on that reactor! See Pages 13, 14, 16, 18.
>> Page 18 has a spark plug on the desk. Interesting...
> 
> Maybe they preload hydrogen,  let in some oxygen and ignite it.  Gives a very 
> sharp pressure/temperature pulse.

I thought this was a neat idea for startup until I realized that this would 
form water in there, which would then need to be flushed out. I'd think that 
gas would not be flowing through an operating device, and consumption of 
hydrogen (requiring flow in) would be very low. It could be a lot more 
complicated than electrically heating the thing.  

Reply via email to