Dear Jojo, The medical doctors who will perform the dissection of democracy wll think a lot about if people had a right to have an opinion, with or without basing this opinion on information and facts. LENR, unfortunately cannot be developed in the Salk vaccine style. Despite my suggestion some people are not able to grasp the difficulty of the task. I have never met you, have no idea who you are and what is essential, do you have hands-on, brains in experience in industrial development of any kind, mechanical, electric, chemical IT whatever? D o you think that the formula without understanding its functionality- what it is doing actually- is of great value? I think the formula is some 10% maximum of the entire development work till the first prototype. Without a holistic and holographic understanding of the LENR+ theory- actually a combination of more theories no progress is possible. The DGTG people are simply better than Rossi and the Divorce took place because Rossi could not solve some basic development problems; do you think it was moral to abandon the problem and let Rossi continue. Have no idea where are you living- but can you empathise with the Greek people? I can. The company cannot use your adoration or your hatred- the problem is could it use your expertise? You have seen they were hiring, what are your chances to be hired based on your CV? And please- again- if you are speaking about my role, have the the kindness to ask me first. i appreciate your creativity and ideas but with some filters. Peter
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ** > Peter, when someone has a technology that is as revolutionary as > Commercial-level LENR as DGT has, they cease to have this implied > protection anymore. > > LENR is a symbol and icon of hope for many many people. DGT has a social > and ethical responsibility to address people's concern about it. If DGT > does not feel it is their responsibility; then they should stop danggling a > carrot in front of a hungry world. A world hungry for LENR technology. It > is cruel and unethical to danggle food in front of hungry orphans. A sane > and reasonable man would not do this, and yet both DGT and Rossi feel that > this is their right. If they do not want to have to explain their > technology, then stop teasing people with it. DGT and Rossi has been the > recipient of people's ire because of this. > > And you, having participated in this, will receive people's ire. You can > not do this and expect people would reciprocate you with respect. You get > what your actions dictate; the same respect one gets when one danggle food > in front of hungry orphans. > > I stand by my original assessement. DGT is a company of crooks headed by > a person who practically admitted to stealing another's IP and come out > with a straight face. Unbelievable how you think this company deserves our > continuing adoration and attention. > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:48 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:principles of DGTG 's technology > > Dear Steven, > > This could be significant only if DGTG is in some trouble, however they > will demonstrate their Hyperions, get them on the market and that's all. > Almost equally interesting is their > contribution to understanding of LENR > Then they will publish more data, independent ones included. > Their strategy is their strategy and that's not a tautology. > Their responsibility is not toward people who are just curious > and unpatient. > Peter > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:32 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson < > svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Mainly their own data, but why are you asking- do you think only >> independent >> > data = good? DGTG has reciprocal NDA with independent observers. >> > in the next paper you will receive these data- I also have a very >> strict NDA >> > with them. >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> I assume the biggest complaint that will be raised on this matter is >> the fact that not having at our disposal sufficient "independent data" >> to collaborate Defkalion's claims reduces the authenticity of such >> claims. >> >> Skeptics will immediately focus on such issues, as is their right to do >> so. >> >> If we don't have "independent data" how do we go about assessing the >> merits of whether Defkalion's claims are accurate? >> >> Regards >> Steven Vincent Johnson >> www.OrionWorks.com >> www.zazzle.com/orionworks >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
