________________________________
 Von: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Gesendet: 20:23 Dienstag, 11.September 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a 
conspiracy
 

Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com> wrote:
 
>> not over here (Germany).  As far as i know, the MPP, which is the biggest 
>> May-Planck-Institute, tried to replicate F/P and failed. so the issue was 
>> settled.

I do not know about this test, but it would be ridiculous to reject cold fusion 
based on one test in 1989, especially after 100 other labs replicated 
successfully. In any case, in 1990 the Director of the Max Planck Institute for 
Physical Chemistry wrote that he was certain the effect is real. See:


http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GerischerHiscoldfusi.pdf 

- Jed

This is a completely different institute, and one probaly has to know the 
intricacies of the Max-Planck organization.
Max-planck Directors are basically completely independent feudal lords, and the 
institute is resumed, when the 'master' retires.
at least this was the idea when the Max Planck Institutes  were termed 'Kaiser 
Wilhelm Gesellschaft'.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft_zur_Foerderung_der_Wissenschaften#Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institute

Never mind.

The IPP  is different, in that it is so large that the old concept does not 
apply anymore. It -the old concept- applies to budgets of several millions, and 
not hundreds of millions.
The IPP is the biggest of all Max-Planck institutes, and therefore has >10 
Directors., which form a collective, and is alien to the original -as said- 
feudal conception of a scientific lordship.

PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE THOSE!
Foreigners naturally do not understand the fine-print of such a delicate 
institution. 
I can understand that.

Wikipedia does not tell the story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck_Institute_of_Plasma_Physics.
The German wikipedia  neither, btw.

in German it reads like this:
...
Im Mai 2010 teilte die Europäische Kommission mit, dass laut einer aktuellen 
Kostenschätzung ihr Anteil an den 
Baukosten von ehemals geplanten 2,7 Milliarden Euro auf 7,3 Milliarden 
Euro steigen wird. Daraus errechnen sich Gesamtkosten in Höhe von 16 
Milliarden Euro.
...
Die EU deckelte daraufhin ihren Anteil bei 6,6 Milliarden Euro. Sie will die 
Kostensteigerungen durch Umschichtungen aus dem Agrar- und dem 
Forschungsetat decken.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER#Finanzierung

You do not need to be a native german speaker to know from where the wind blows.
This is BIG money, and it is government money!

Guenter

Reply via email to