Mark: This appears to be your second article on LENR, at least as far as I am aware. For the third article, why don't you correspond with Jed Rothwell and incorporate some of his excellent advice? Kevmo
--- On Sun, 10/21/12, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote: From: Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A little more positive article on Cold Fusion from Gibbs To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 10:37 AM If you go back and re-read my previous columns on cold fusion you'll see that my interest has always been in useful cold fusion ... The cold fusion phenomena, while scientifically intriguing, amounts to to nothing of practical interest if you can't do something useful with it ... rather like muon catalyzed fusion ... Interesting but not practically useful. [mg] On Sunday, October 21, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: Gibbs: "I know that there will be a handful of people (the “believers” I wrote about some time ago) who read that statement and cry “lies” but the fact is that no one has yet demonstrated, definitively, that cold fusion or LENR exists in a form that is actually useful." Now the argument is being useful. LOL!
