Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Dfkalion also reports high RF interference with the phone systems and > their SCADA function. > > > Yes, which indicates that their claim for a 1.6 T magnetic field resulted > from a misreading of the Gauss meter, perhaps because the meter was > influenced by an RF field, not a magnetic field. >
Yeah. Phone systems are usually robust. I have heard of them being disrupted by RF but not a magnetic field. Then again who knows what a 1.6 T magnetic field would do? (Assuming it is real.) I think Ed's main point is that you should not assume there is no instrument artifact when the signs point to one: 1. The result is highly unexpected. 2. It appears to violate textbook physics. 3. There has to be strong RF noise, and that is known to cause instrument artifacts. That is not proof the result is wrong, but it should give you pause. It is fine for Axil to be encouraged by this result because it may support the nanoplasmonics theory. This particular evidence is important to him. He should pay close attention to it. But he should be prepared to accept it is wrong, should additional evidence emerge. Defkalion has not been good at supplying additional information or clarifying this sort of thing. They have left many loose ends loose. - Jed
