However I think it is more important that DGT has cut some Gordian Knots Peter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Dfkalion also reports high RF interference with the phone systems and >> their SCADA function. >> >> >> Yes, which indicates that their claim for a 1.6 T magnetic field resulted >> from a misreading of the Gauss meter, perhaps because the meter was >> influenced by an RF field, not a magnetic field. >> > > Yeah. Phone systems are usually robust. I have heard of them being > disrupted by RF but not a magnetic field. Then again who knows what a 1.6 T > magnetic field would do? (Assuming it is real.) > > I think Ed's main point is that you should not assume there is no > instrument artifact when the signs point to one: > > 1. The result is highly unexpected. > 2. It appears to violate textbook physics. > 3. There has to be strong RF noise, and that is known to cause instrument > artifacts. > > That is not proof the result is wrong, but it should give you pause. It is > fine for Axil to be encouraged by this result because it may support the > nanoplasmonics theory. This particular evidence is important to him. He > should pay close attention to it. But he should be prepared to accept it is > wrong, should additional evidence emerge. > > Defkalion has not been good at supplying additional information or > clarifying this sort of thing. They have left many loose ends loose. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
