Axil -- How is a plasmon condensate promoting a heat generating effect in NiH systems? What is the quantum-coherent quasi-particle (aka soliton) system, connected through a "whispering quantum hall effect" between nano-cavities (perhaps being drawn in by nano-whiskers), doing with the hydrogen to produce observed excess heat? Fusing it? Fusion/Fission? Why/how? Based on your systems engineering background, I can see why you were drawn to such a complex and holistic model.
Another thing is, I'm not yet convinced of superconductivity for example -- I'd be interested for sure to see someone measure NAE for a mini-Meissner effect. That would be more convincing than just Miley's measurements that has a number of different explanations beyond achieving SC. I think you take SC as a given based on scant evidence. Or Tesla-scale magnetic fields that I think you take as a given without proper replication or surety of truth. Considering DGT likely botched a simple demo last July, I'm not as confident in their technical know-how as I once was. Regards, John On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > at this point, the idea of plasmon-induced BEC makes a number of leaps of > faith & assumptions that I don't think are yet born out by experiment. > > I could help you go through those many experiments one at a time. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Axil, don't misunderstand, I have definitely read reference material >> concerning what you're talking about. I find a lot of it interesting and >> possibly suggestive of what might be going on in plasmatic NiH systems. I >> don't take any current theory as "the truth" -- yours or Ed's. I have >> questions about all of them. Like all theories at this point, the idea of >> plasmon-induced BEC makes a number of leaps of faith & assumptions that I >> don't think are yet born out by experiment. There's hints, as you've >> stated, that could be connected, but they don't necessarily have to be. But >> again, at least it seems like w/ NiH you're trying to put together some >> experimental tests, which I appreciate & like about what you're doing. >> Also, I know you trust all the DGT data, but I don't, so we're at an >> impasse there. I will be very excited if they are actually doing legitimate >> mass spectroscopy work as promised however. >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I will answer the other two, but I also hope that you will attempt to >>> understand some Nanoplasmonics. Just read the intro, and concentrate on how >>> hot spots work. Please....I need more targets. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for a bit about your background, I appreciate that. But you >>>> still have two more to go before the toll is paid I'm afraid. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I will pay your price so here is #2 >>>>> >>>>> * Do you have a background in science, a self-taught amateur, or >>>>> somewhere in between? I don't think it's fair to be completely anonymous >>>>> when putting forth some sort of grand unified TOE.* >>>>> >>>>> I have a degree in physics, but make a living as a system engineer. I >>>>> specialize in reverse engineering old system's where all info about >>>>> how they work and what they do has been lose to the ravages of time. I >>>>> study such systems in order to upgrade them to a new and/or higher level >>>>> of technology. >>>>> >>>>> The skill set that I have perfected over many years is a great help >>>>> in connecting the dots. I believe I can connect the dots with the best of >>>>> them. A systems engineer is a generalist and a good one will >>>>> become competent or expert is any technology that is required to >>>>> understand >>>>> how a given system works. >>>>> >>>>> As a paranoid, I am afraid of Putin. When Putin finds out that the >>>>> LENR GUT has destroyed his dreams, his friends, and is removing him from >>>>> power, he will be pissed and being unknown to him for as long as possible >>>>> is reassuring to me. >>>>> >>>>> And there are many centers of power like Putin. >>>>> >>>>> Rossi has said that he has protection. I think that he does >>>>> but I surly don't. >>>>> >>>>> The more people who know how LENR works, the more targets there will >>>>> be during the big reveal. But no one is willing to take that path. I want >>>>> more target so I am not the only one. Any volunteers? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I know you can explain them away. That's not much of an >>>>>> accomplishment. Are you going to take the time to answer the other three >>>>>> questions I posed to you before we go off on this tangent? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, >>>>>>> something which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories >>>>>>> like >>>>>>> Kim's or Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still >>>>>>> confront a >>>>>>> number of problems as you probably know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great, let us talk about these problems. I don't see problems. I bet >>>>>>> I can explain away these problems. Please give be a shot at that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It >>>>>>>> doesn't contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah, fermions & >>>>>>>> bosons >>>>>>>> play different roles in nuclear process, in all processes actually -- >>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>> what? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, >>>>>>>> something which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories >>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>> Kim's or Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still >>>>>>>> confront a >>>>>>>> number of problems as you probably know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One can just as easily picture a more general process (as I >>>>>>>> just highlighted in two different hot fusion systems), absent of >>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>> phase transitions, occurring across different LENR systems. Based on >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> evidence so far, I think at best it could be argued that there a draw >>>>>>>> exists between the two points of view. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I appreciate you clearing up any confusions. Take care. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* Foks0904 . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such >>>>>>>>> as traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the >>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>> isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a >>>>>>>>> reaction path progresses and generates effects. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not so! Bosons are very different from Fermions – profoundly >>>>>>>>> different when it comes to nuclear interaction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Enough said? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
