Will this third party test be honest and all revealing? Will the independent testers keep the reasons why they have tested the Hot-Cat system in a particular way secret as per some initial understanding with Rossi to keep confidential the design and theory that underpins the Hot-Cat.
In particular, during this second third party test (TPT), I predict that the Hot-Cat will generate a huge amount of Radio frequency (RF) radiation. This very large amount of RF will by its fundamental nature have imposed a major impediment in testing. People who test a system that produces a large amount of RF radiation are operating in a highly disorderly testing environment. To compensate, the testers would have needed to avoid the disruptions and inherent inaccuracies imposed on the monitoring electronics and sensors that such a radiating system imposes on the testing equipment. I believe that this huge RF radiation environment forced the use of a remote temperature camera in the first TPT test. This gigantic RF production will be a major clue as to how the E-Cat works. Will the testers keep the reasons why they are compensating for the RF interference a secret as required by an initial pretest confidentiality agreement with Rossi. This emanation of a large RF signature from the Hot-Cat will be an unambiguous clue to how the Hot-Cat works. If the TPT is scientifically honest, I expect to see a chart that depicts the RF emanations from the Hot-Cat as a function of power output. This would be similar to a gamma radiation chart vs. power output. If the TPT is scientifically honest, the inner workings of the Hot-Cat will be easy to see from the data provided. If the past is prolog, from what was publicized in the first TPT, there will be a careful screening of the test data that is revealed publically in this second TPT to keep the inner workings of the Hot-Cat opaque. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Friends, > > Anticipating some possible effects of the Rossi Report 2, > I have published: > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/it-comes-judgment-day-for-lenr-paradigm.html > > Let's wait and see if I was right. To increase my chsnces I predicted more > things, some contradictory. A good researcher can become a prophet after > retirement. > Peter > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
