The dark wire is thinner than the bright shadows so I think that the wire is casting the shadow.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > It could just as well be that the resistive wires are what are bright and > the gaps between them are where it gets darker. > > If this were the case, won't there be a double dark shadow cast on either > side of the wire with the bright wire in between. > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >> >> The "shadows" of the wires in figs 12 are problematic ... but we don't >>> have enough information to figure out if they are actually the result of >>> light, or if they represent zones of different thermal conductivity, as in >>> the first independent test (which had a steel outer cylinder). >>> >> >> I've thought about this, too. In both this report and the previous one, >> there was the suggestion that the inside of the E-Cat is so radiant that >> the resistive wires are darker and conceal some of this, creating shadows >> of sorts. On the basis of the photos that have been provided, there's no >> reason to conclude this. It could just as well be that the resistive wires >> are what are bright and the gaps between them are where it gets darker. >> Perhaps if one is able to get close to an operating E-Cat there is enough >> parallax to see where the wires are in relation to whatever is behind them. >> >> Eric >> >> >
