On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:19 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This is somewhat related to the bulk move of Chromium-WebKit contributors to 
> Blink, but we might want to consider sunsetting/expiring committership and 
> reviewership.
> 
> I'm thinking of something like expiring committership/reviwership of a person 
> after the person didn't have any SVN activities for 3 or 6 months.
> 
> Any thoughts or opinions?

My third-party perspective:

This might make sense for reviewer status which is more about project 
leadership/direction but perhaps not for committer status which is more about 
proven good judgement and experience. I don't think the WebKit code base 
evolves so unexpectedly that 6 months invalidates the qualifications for 
committer status. Also consider:

1. Removing committers is actually more work than not removing them -- you now 
need to track start dates and run jobs to identify expired people. You also 
potentially need warnings, a review process in case of mistakes, etc.

2. People employed for WebKit development might be absent 6 months for totally 
valid reasons like maternity/paternity leave.

Regards,
Marshall

> 
> - R. Niwa
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to