+1 IMO, as Dirk suggested, the deactivation of the account is more reasonable unless the reviewership or committership is revoked,
Gyuyoung On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:00 AM, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen < > kenneth.christian...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am not sure this is really needed. People sometimes disappear from >> working on trunk for extended periods of time due to internal products >> and downstream branches. It has happened multiple times to me. That >> doesn't mean that I won't come back and start working upstream later. >> >> Also it could be that some people working on Blink would like to >> contribute to WebKit in their spare time or in the future again. >> >> Part of being a reviewer is also knowing what and when to review, so I >> am not sure there really is an issue here. >> > > I'm not too concerned about the reviwership but more about committership > from a security point of view. > > I don't think a lot of committers are going to monitor their old SVN > accounts and update passwords periodically. Having lots of inactive SVN > accounts isn't that helpful. > > Maybe I didn't phrase it correctly, but I'm suggesting more of suspension > so that we have a smaller attack surface for SVN credentials. > > > Suggesting the deactivation of the SVN account is reasonable, as long as > you get it back on request. > > Greetings > Dirk > > > - R. Niwa > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
