On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:05:04PM -0200, Toby Thain wrote: > > Yup - that's exactly the kind of error that ZFS and WAFL do a > > perhaps uniquely good job of catching. > > WAFL can't catch all: It's distantly isolated from the CPU end.
How so? The checksumming method is different from ZFS, but as far as I understand rather similar in capability. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
