On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Eric D. Mudama <edmud...@bounceswoosh.org> wrote: > Yea, kept googling and it makes sense. I guess I am simply surprised > that the application would have done the seek+write combination, since > on NTFS (which doesn't support sparse) these would have been real > 1.5GB files, and there would be hundreds or thousands of them in > normal usage.
It could have been smbd compressing long runs of zeros. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
