On Mon, May  2 at 15:30, Brandon High wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Eric D. Mudama
<edmud...@bounceswoosh.org> wrote:
that the application would have done the seek+write combination, since
on NTFS (which doesn't support sparse) these would have been real
1.5GB files, and there would be hundreds or thousands of them in
normal usage.

NTFS supports sparse files.
http://www.flexhex.com/docs/articles/sparse-files.phtml


ok corrected, thx.  my google-fu had indicated otherwise, thanks

--
Eric D. Mudama
edmud...@bounceswoosh.org

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to