Justin's interpretations of my email are correct. For the record, here's the error handler:
Error:=Error So, yeah, nothing exciting there. I posted my code because I'm not confidant in it. I don't remember when I wrote it and I haven't kept up with all of the various permutations on where sets are stored, etc. Some server, some local, etc. No clue. (I asked about how this is meant to work in pre-emptive processes because my results surprised me, but I never did hear back that I can recall.) So, I'd be grateful if anyone that is Really Into Sets (we all know you're out there!) gave it some thought. If it's reliable, great! If not, I'll kill it rather than rely on it. I'm with Justin on the IP flag in the error handler. That's provably unreliable in a multi-process system. Thanks for all comments and help! ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
