Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> <  ------------ Pu*vodní zpráva ------------
> <  Od: Ralf Mardorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <  Pr(edme(t: Re: [64studio-users] Rebuild alsa
> <  Datum: 06.10.2008 00:47:19
> <  ----------------------------------------
> <  Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> <  > Hi,
> <  >
> <  > I've compiled new kernel for me 2.6.24.7-rt20 which seems to have a bug 
> in
> <  builded alsa modules (RME Digiface).
> <  >
> <  > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.user/29391/match=2.6.24
> <  >
> <  > I would like to upgrade alsa modules from 1.0.15 to 1.0.17
> <  >
> <  > Is there any way how to do it?
> <  > I didn't found any new howto which I dare to follow.
> <  >
> <  > Thanks for advice.
> <  >
> <  > mira
> <  
> <  'ALSA driver sources
> <  This package contains the source code for the ALSA drivers.
> <  The source code can be compiled into an alsa-modules package
> <  using the m-a utility (available in the module-assistant
> <  package). Please note that the kernel headers must be
> <  installed to compile these modules. Please read the
> <  README.Debian file for more information about loading and
> <  building modules.
> <  
> <  ALSA is the Advanced Linux Sound Architecture.'
> <  
> <  deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
> <  
> <  But why don't you use the 2.6.21-1 default kernel coming with modules
> <  1.0.17?
> <  
>
> Thanks a lot for help Ralf
> I've tried compile my own kernel just because 64studio has generic kernel it 
> is mean kernel suitable for many computers.
> I was curious to a difference in performance with new kernel compiled exactly 
> for my processor.
> And mainly because I am curious :-)
> I am just compiling my kernel without embeded alsa modules and then I will 
> try to build them your way.
> I'll let you how it was goiing.
>
> mira

Hi Mira :)

I compiled 2.6.24.7-rt17 for my 64 Studio 2.1 vanilla install, but
didn't compiled ALSA modules. I'm also running a 64 Studio 2.1 upgarded
to Lenny using the 2.6.21 kernel and Suse 11.0 using a kernel-rt 2.6.25.
There are no big differences for me. I just did it because I cant run
Rosegarden or MusE, no sequencer using ALSA MIDI clients seems to be fine.

You might run into dependency troubles, when compiling ALSA modules,
because the 1.0.17 source is from Lenny. 1.0.16 seems to be available
for 64 Studio 2.1 testing.

Good luck,
Ralf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to