Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > This makes me wonder how 64studio's developers got 1.0.17(current stable) > alsa in default 2.6.21 kernel .... hats off > > -you can get info about your alsa like this: > #cat /proc/asound/version > > -I really can only recommend to stay with default kernel for now it is really > good one.
Hi Mira :) /asound/version for the 64 Studio 2.6.21-1 says 1.0.16, only Synaptic shows a package called alsa-modules... 1.0.17 as installed and my 64 Studio's kernel 2.6.24.7-rt17 also comes with 1.0.15. The latest Suse RT is 2.6.25.16-0.1-rt, using 1.0.16rc2. I tested 2.6.21-1and 2.6.25.7-rt17 with 64 Studio running 2.1 and 2.6.21-1 running 64 Studio Lenny, but ALSA MIDI isn't fine. I also tested 2.6.25.11-0.1-rt with Suse 11.0 and ALSA MIDI isn't okay for it too. I hope I'll have better luck when testing ALSA MIDI and also JACK MIDI with Suse's 2.6.25.16-0.1-rt. At the moment I can't recommend any LINUX kernel to use with MIDI. The Linux kernels seems to be not fine for many motherboards, independent if they are AMD/ATI or Intel based. Thank you for the informations. Cheers, Ralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
