Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Gustin Johnson wrote:
> >> There are better options (more reliable with a wider degree of
> >> compatibility) than DVD-RAM.  USB mass storage is your friend.
> > PS:
>
> > I'm using UDF for DVD-RAM, but it's also possible to use FAT. The
> > disadvantage for an USB stick would be, that for exchanging data it has
> > to be FAT. UDF allows to preserve permissions for Linux, while Windows
>
> That is why you use tar.  It does not matter what kind of file system
> you store the tar file on.

Using tar on FAT to preserve permissions is a good idea, I didn't think
about this, but not for quick drag'n'drop.

There seems to be a way that UDF will work for exchange between Linux
and Windows and this would be the better choice for DVD-RAM.

-- 
Best,
Ralf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to