Irwin Oppenheim wrote -
>That's also a reasonable approach. But what do you do
>with pseudo comments?
I'm not sure what you mean by pseudo comments. Could you give an example?
>This example was only given to show how absurd the
>semantics of the 1.6 standard were.
But the 1.6 standard doesn't include the w: command (only the W: command) and does not require continuation slashes for imbedded commands so the example given didn't conform to that standard anyway.
Bryan Creer
- [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers]backslashes John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Arent Storm
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Phil Taylor
- [abcusers] Changelog I. Oppenheim
- [abcusers] \ line continuation (was: Re: Change... Jeff Bigler
- Re: [abcusers] \ line continuation (was: Re... I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes B . J . Say
- [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Wil Macaulay
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
