Irwin Oppenheim  wrote -

>That's also a reasonable approach. But what do you do
>with pseudo comments?

I'm not sure what you mean by pseudo comments.  Could you give an example?

>This example was only given to show how absurd the
>semantics of the 1.6 standard were.

But the 1.6 standard doesn't include the w: command (only the W: command) and does not require continuation slashes for imbedded commands so the example given didn't conform to that standard anyway.

Bryan Creer

Reply via email to