Hi Stefan, Thanks for putting this together. I have some detailed comments on the subsections in section 2 which I will provide under separate subjects. In general I would like the draft to be more explanatory about when it is a good idea to move beyond the applicability statement. I'll include some of this in my comments on section 2, some of which may also be incorporated into section 4. I do not think we should rename the protocol as suggested in section 3.
Cheers, Joe On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Stefan Winter wrote: > Hello, > > I foolishly volunteered to draft an update to the EAP applicability > statement. With the help of very knowledgable people, in particular Joe > Salowey and Sam Hartman, I made an initial attempt: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winter-abfab-eapapplicability-00 > > This obviously isn't perfect, and I would welcome comments of any sort > (including, but not limited to, offers for text and/or co-authorship :-) ). > > Greetings, > > Stefan Winter > > -- > Stefan WINTER > Ingenieur de Recherche > Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la > Recherche > 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi > L-1359 Luxembourg > > Tel: +352 424409 1 > Fax: +352 422473 > > > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
