I agree with Joe that we don't need to rename the protocol name.
Extensible Authentication Protocol is good enough.
Yoshihiro Ohba
(2011/06/10 10:07), Joe Salowey wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for putting this together. I have some detailed comments on the
subsections in section 2 which I will provide under separate subjects. In
general I would like the draft to be more explanatory about when it is a good
idea to move beyond the applicability statement. I'll include some of this in
my comments on section 2, some of which may also be incorporated into section
4. I do not think we should rename the protocol as suggested in section 3.
Cheers,
Joe
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Stefan Winter wrote:
Hello,
I foolishly volunteered to draft an update to the EAP applicability
statement. With the help of very knowledgable people, in particular Joe
Salowey and Sam Hartman, I made an initial attempt:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winter-abfab-eapapplicability-00
This obviously isn't perfect, and I would welcome comments of any sort
(including, but not limited to, offers for text and/or co-authorship :-) ).
Greetings,
Stefan Winter
--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la
Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
