> -----Original Message----- > From: Alper Yegin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:46 PM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: 'Sam Hartman'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [abfab] Retransmission Text for EAP applicability > > >> In EAP, the authenticator is responsible for retransmission. By default > > EAP > >> assumes that the lower layer (the application in this context) is > > unreliable. > > s/lower layer/lower layer transport/ > > "EAP lower layer" is a term defined in RFC 3748. I believe the text intends to > refer to that. So, we better stick with the precise term. >
I would like having transport in there as it tells me more what is going on. However I can live without it. By your argument should the term "lower layer" always be changed to "EAP lower layer" Jim _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
