>>>> In EAP, the authenticator is responsible for retransmission. By default >>> EAP >>>> assumes that the lower layer (the application in this context) is >>> unreliable. >>> s/lower layer/lower layer transport/ >> >> "EAP lower layer" is a term defined in RFC 3748. I believe the text > intends to >> refer to that. So, we better stick with the precise term. >> > > I would like having transport in there as it tells me more what is going on. > However I can live without it. > > By your argument should the term "lower layer" always be changed to "EAP > lower layer" >
Yes, with a reference to RFC 3748. > Jim > > _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
