On 03 May 2001 20:03:20 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jesper Skov wrote: > > > > Anyway, we should make an entry in the FAQ (and the weekly news) about > > the new numbering scheme, so people can see that AbiWord has been in > > development for 3 years before the change. > > > > Please don't do that yet! I'm not ready to agree to a new versioning > system. We've spent years telling people what our versioning system > is. I'm not ready to change that. Not at least until I'm overwhelmed with > good reasons. I fully agree. I really prefer the x.y.z system. This way I (and the users) can understand easily if a version is unstable/stable. Cheers, -- Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Daniel Lawrence
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Patrick Lam
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme an... Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 David Chart
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
