>>>>> "Sam" == Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sam> I agree with Martin as well. Just for the record, I think the case is closed. We stick with the traditional versioning scheme. Project top dogs don't feel good about the suggested one. No problem - I just wanted it to be considered. Thanks, Jesper
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Patrick Lam
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 David Chart
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
