On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Sam TH wrote: > I think that you should seriously bring this up after 1.0. It has > significant potential. But we've been hyping 1.0 for a *long* time, > and so people expect it. That's all. Hyping about 1.0? Hello? People expect 1.0 to be ready when it's ready, not in day X of year Y. Pity most software tends to disappoint people, in that regard. Hugs, rms
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Patrick Lam
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 David Chart
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
PGP signature