On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:12:40PM +0200, Jesper Skov wrote:
> >>>>> "Sam" == Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sam> I agree with Martin as well.
>
>
> Just for the record, I think the case is closed. We stick with the
> traditional versioning scheme.
>
> Project top dogs don't feel good about the suggested one. No problem -
> I just wanted it to be considered.
I think that you should seriously bring this up after 1.0. It has
significant potential. But we've been hyping 1.0 for a *long* time,
and so people expect it. That's all.
sam th --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key
DeCSS: http://samth.dynds.org/decss
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Patrick Lam
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 David Chart
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
PGP signature