dom> Well, I'm just not sure what our users will think of this. We dom> might have the unwanted effect of confusing them, which would be dom> bad. People seem to have recovered nicely from when MS changed their numbering scheme from "6" to "2000", and earlier when their competitors jumped from "2" to "6" for brochure parity. Most of the ritual suicides have tapered off. :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119 38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0 WJCarpenter
