Jamie,
Well you can add reverse relationships later if it becomes an issue. The only problem with adding it later is you will also then need to test if that reverse relation ship exists and what to do with older browsers that won't have the relationship.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
----- Original message -----
From: James Teh <ja...@nvaccess.org>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, surkov.alexan...@gmail.com, ble...@freedomscientific.com, jdi...@igalia.com
Cc: accessibility-...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Reverse relationships
Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2016 7:34 PM
As I noted previously:
5. Reverse relations may well be useful in the future. However, if they're a potential perf problem, I agree it makes sense to wait until we have a use case, so long as implementers accept that this use case may one day arise.
Right now, we have no plans to implement a "jump to field for error message" command or similar. Perhaps we will one day, but it seems flawed to sacrifice performance for something no one is using yet.
Jamie
On 7/09/2016 5:56 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:We need agreement:Should the error message and details relationships have reverse mappings?Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger--
James Teh
Executive Director, NV Access Limited
Ph +61 7 3149 3306
www.nvaccess.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
Twitter: @NVAccess
SIP: ja...@nvaccess.org
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
