Hi, Brett. Can you please elaborate your use case? My understanding is AT skips error/details, if the user encounters them, but announce them, when the user navigates to an element related with error/details. Why would AT need to find a related element by error/details?
Thanks. Alex. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Brett Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I think we do need the reverse relationships. > > Web authors can place the error/details anywhere on the page and there > doesn’t seem to be any simple way for the user to determine what element > the error message or details applies to without such a reverse relation. > > Brett > > > > > > *Brett Lewis* > > *VFO* | Software Engineer > > 11800 31st Court North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716 > > *T* 727-299-6270 > > [email protected] > > www.vfo-group.com > > > > > > *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2016 12:57 PM > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected]; Brett Lewis < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Reverse relationships > > > > We need agreement: > > > > Should the error message and details relationships have reverse mappings? > > > > Rich > > > > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > > >
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
