Alex,

I've created an issue for the core-aam to make the change [1].  I will
bring it up at next Tue's telecon to confirm that everyone is on board,
but based on your email, it looks like the change will be approved.

Thanks.

[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1051

On 2016-10-21 11:37 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> Joseph, should we request an update core-aam spec to make this change?
> anything else?
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:17 PM, James Teh <ja...@nvaccess.org
> <mailto:ja...@nvaccess.org>> wrote:
>
>     placeholder-text is fine with me.
>
>     On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Alexander Surkov
>     <surkov.alexan...@gmail.com <mailto:surkov.alexan...@gmail.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Joanie suggested [1] to use 'placeholder-text' name to keep
>         IAccessible2 and ATK closer. Are there objections?
>
>         Having, placeholder for IA2 and placeholder-text for ATK could
>         make life harder for implementators, at least it definitely
>         will do in Firefox case.
>
>         [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303429
>         <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303429>
>
>         On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:08 PM, James Teh <ja...@nvaccess.org
>         <mailto:ja...@nvaccess.org>> wrote:
>
>             Visually, placeholder is certainly more like a value than
>             a name/description. However, arguably, it is semantically
>             different to a value in that it's more of a hint for the
>             user as to what to enter there. The reason for the name
>             mapping was partially because it's a nice fallback: having
>             no label at all is probably an authoring error, so it's
>             reasonable to fall back to placeholder.
>
>             I think I originally supported the description idea, but
>             on further reflection, I'm not so sure this isn't going to
>             cause problems. It just occurred to me that if an author
>             sets title or aria-describedby, that will get mapped to
>             description, thus killing the placeholder. So, we
>             definitely need to expose the placeholder attribute.
>             However, once we have that (plus AT support), we then
>             always have to compare description with placeholder "just
>             in case", which is pretty ugly. Name is different because
>             while no name is probably authoring error, no description
>             certainly isn't.
>
>             In short, I'd like to propose that we:
>             1. Expose the placeholder attribute;
>             2. Keep the current behaviour of falling back to
>             placeholder for name as a last resort;
>             3. When 1) happens, expose explicit-name:false;
>             4. Don't ever fall back to placeholder for description.
>
>             Jamie
>
>
>             On 15/09/2016 2:38 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>             Jamie, do you have objections?
>>
>>             On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Brett Lewis
>>             <ble...@vfo-group.com <mailto:ble...@vfo-group.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Hi,
>>
>>                 I have always thought of the placeholder more like a
>>                 value for the edit field rather than a name or
>>                 description.
>>
>>                 However, I think the important thing is that we have
>>                 a mechanism that allows assistive technology to
>>                 “know” that the place holder is present and what the
>>                 value of the placeholder is.
>>
>>                 Your suggestions accomplish that.
>>
>>                 Brett
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                 *Brett Lewis*
>>
>>                 *VFO*| Software Engineer
>>
>>                 11800 31^st Court North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716
>>
>>                 *T*727-299-6270 <tel:727-299-6270>
>>
>>                 ble...@vfo-group.com <mailto:ble...@vfo-group.com>
>>
>>                 www.vfo-group.com <http://www.vfo-group.com>__
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                 *From:*Alexander Surkov
>>                 [mailto:surkov.alexan...@gmail.com
>>                 <mailto:surkov.alexan...@gmail.com>]
>>                 *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 1:52 PM
>>                 *To:* Brett Lewis <ble...@vfo-group.com
>>                 <mailto:ble...@vfo-group.com>>; James Teh
>>                 <ja...@nvaccess.org <mailto:ja...@nvaccess.org>>
>>                 *Cc:* accessibility-...@lists.linux-foundation.org
>>                 <mailto:accessibility-...@lists.linux-foundation.org>
>>                 *Subject:* Re: [Accessibility-ia2] HTML placeholder
>>                 attribute
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                 Hi, Brett and all.
>>
>>                 There's some discrepancy in the specs between UIA and
>>                 IAccessible2 mappings. UIA column states [1] that
>>                 HTML placeholder is mapped to accessible name and
>>                 description, while IAccessible2 column says HTML
>>                 placeholder has same mapping as aria-placeholder.
>>                 aria-placeholder is exposed it in AriaProperties [2]
>>                 for UIA and as object attribute for IAccessible2, the
>>                 generic name computation doesn't mention
>>                 aria-placeholder [3].
>>
>>                 Leaving aside the specs, in case of IAccessible2
>>                 Firefox does similar things to UIA. Iirc we agreed
>>                 [4] to expose placeholder as name/description,
>>                 because it requires zero adoption efforts from AT,
>>                 and since nobody claimed they need semantics of
>>                 placeholder.
>>
>>                 If semantics loss is crucial for you, then I think we
>>                 could fix it by exposing HTML placeholder this way:
>>
>>                 * name and description as Firefox does (fix the spec
>>                 to make it clear)
>>
>>                 * expose placeholder object attribute
>>
>>                 * do not expose explicit-name='true' object attribute
>>                 if placeholder was used as name
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                 aria-placeholder may be left with the current
>>                 mapping. How does it sound?
>>
>>
>>                 [1] https://w3c.github.io/aria/html-aam/html-aam.html
>>                 <https://w3c.github.io/aria/html-aam/html-aam.html>
>>                 [2]
>>                 
>> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/accname-aam/accname-aam.html
>>                 
>> <http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/accname-aam/accname-aam.html>
>>                 [3]
>>                 https://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html
>>                 <https://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html>
>>                 [4]
>>                 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545817
>>                 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545817>
>>
>>                  
>>
>>                 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Brett Lewis
>>                 <ble...@vfo-group.com <mailto:ble...@vfo-group.com>>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi All:
>>
>>                     I have been looking at how the HTML placeholder
>>                     attribute is supported by IA2. 
>>
>>                     According to the HTML accessibility API mappings
>>                     at: https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/
>>                     <https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/>
>>
>>                     The placeholder in HTML should be handled just
>>                     like the aria-placeholder. 
>>
>>                     According to the core api accessibility mappings
>>                     http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html
>>                     <http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html>
>>
>>                     The aria-placeholder is mapped to an Ia2 object
>>                     attribute of placeholder.
>>
>>                     So, it sounds like the HTML placeholder should be
>>                     mapped to an IA2 object attribute of placeholder.
>>
>>                     Currently Firefox seems to support the
>>                     placeholder as the name of the field if there is
>>                     no other name provided by the page author (from
>>                     https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545817
>>                     <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545817>.
>>
>>                     This seems to contradict the description of
>>                     aria-placeholder from
>>
>>                     the WAI-ARIA) 1.1 spec at
>>                     
>> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-placeholder
>>                     
>> <http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-placeholder>
>>
>>                     Says:
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     “[ARIA 1.1] Defines a short hint (a word or short
>>                     phrase) intended to aid the user with data entry
>>                     when the control has no value. A hint could be a
>>                     sample value or a brief description of the
>>                     expected format.
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     Authors should not use aria-placeholder
>>
>>                     instead of a label as their purposes are
>>                     different: The label indicates what kind of
>>                     information is expected. The placeholder text is
>>                     a hint about the
>>
>>                     expected value. See related aria-labelledby and
>>                     aria-label.
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     Authors should present this hint to the user by
>>                     displaying the hint text at any time the
>>                     control's value is the empty string. This
>>                     includes cases where
>>
>>                     the control first receives focus, and when users
>>                     remove a previously-entered value.
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     NOTE
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     As is the case with the related HTML placeholder
>>
>>                     attribute, use of placeholder text as a
>>                     replacement for a displayed label can reduce the
>>                     accessibility and usability of the control for a
>>                     range of users
>>
>>                     including older users and users with cognitive,
>>                     mobility, fine motor skill or vision impairments.
>>                     While the hint given by the control's label is shown
>>
>>                     at all times, the short hint given in the
>>                     placeholder attribute is only shown before the
>>                     user enters a value. Furthermore, placeholder
>>                     text may be mistaken for a pre-filled value, and
>>                     as commonly implemented the default color of the
>>                     placeholder text provides insufficient contrast
>>                     and the lack of a separate visible label reduces
>>                     the size of the hit region available for setting
>>                     focus on the control.”
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     I am suggesting that we all agree to present the
>>                     HTML placeholder just like the aria-placeholder
>>                     using the IA2 object attribute of placeholder?
>>
>>                     This provides the most flexibility for
>>                     screenreaders to present the placeholder
>>                     information anyway they see fit.  Using the
>>                     placeholder as the name is not as flexible as the
>>                     screenreader cannot distinguish between the
>>                     placeholder and the label in this case.
>>
>>                     What does everyone think?
>>
>>                     Thanks,
>>
>>                     Brett
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                      
>>
>>                     *Brett Lewis*
>>
>>                     *VFO*| Software Engineer
>>
>>                     11800 31^st Court North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716
>>
>>                     *T*727-299-6270 <tel:727-299-6270>
>>
>>                     ble...@vfo-group.com <mailto:ble...@vfo-group.com>
>>
>>                     www.vfo-group.com <http://www.vfo-group.com>
>>
>>                      
>>
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
>>                     Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>                     <mailto:Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>>                     
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
>>                     
>> <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2>
>>
>>                  
>>
>>
>
>             -- 
>             James Teh
>             Executive Director, NV Access Limited
>             Ph +61 7 3149 3306 <tel:%2B61%207%203149%203306>
>             www.nvaccess.org <http://www.nvaccess.org>
>             Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
>             <http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess>
>             Twitter: @NVAccess
>             SIP: ja...@nvaccess.org <mailto:ja...@nvaccess.org>
>
-- 
;;;;joseph.

'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.'
                 - C. Carter -
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2

Reply via email to