I could not find the letters USB anywhere in the BIOS, and I looked down
every menu tree. The paper you reference says that the DL380 does not
support hot plug USB. It really looks like my original statement that some
machines cannot boot with a live USB HD stands. Strangely enough, though,
the machine isn't bothered by a USB memory stick or a USB diskette.
BTW it also does not have a USB port in the front. What were they thinking?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no boot
HP provides support for USB devices prior to the operating system loading
through legacy USB support, which is enabled by default in the system ROM.
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/platforms/usb-support.html
Can you disable that in the bios? Disable legacy USB support?
Brian Desmond wrote:
That is possible, then. G4 was when they added the USB ports on the
front and the usb key stuff.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no boot
DL380 R03 P2400XEON US
Product #: 257917-001
Thank you, Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Desmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 6:09 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no boot
What generation and model is the server - DL is just the make, still
need the model and year. :)
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 3:51 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no boot
Nothing doing. I tried it on a 3-year old Proliant DL. I couldn't
find any
USB settings, not in the boot order, not in the boot selections, not
anywhere. It's back to the old switch and bai...er...boot
----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert Duro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
That's a great revelation. Thank you. I'll try it first thing in
the
morning.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laura A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 2:25 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Remember when I asked about the BIOS? :-)
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/usb-boot.mspx
You can check out the links at the end for more information, but
again,
this
is set in the BIOS of the machine.
Laura
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 4:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Susan,
How did you do that I would love to be able to reboot
with a worry.
Bob
IT Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
And on my DC I removed the USB drive as a boot device.
So now I can be at home in my jammies and remotely reboot the
server
with no issues and it will reboot just fine.
Bob Anderson wrote:
Laura,
Yea that on bit me big time. Had our Domain Controller
running
and
added a USB Drive all was fine. Along came Microsoft with
the darned
Updates and there 'Computer Must be restarted' Well it
restarted
alright and would not reboot. Talked to IBM Server Support
for
4
hours be for I finally figured it out myself. That was the
only time
I ever taught something to them and not the other way around.
I have since update the restart procedure to say 'Power off
the
USB
drive before the system restarts.'
Bob
IT Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura
A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Umm, that was kinda the point I was trying to make, Bob. :-)
Laura
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:09 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Laura,
It doesn't matter what the boot order is. Most servers have
an
internal Raid configuration that doesn't kick in until after
the
machine goes through it's start up and by them it has
found the USB
and not the hard disks.
And yes I have this on two of my servers.
Bob Anderson
IT Guy
Kent Sporting Goods
433 Park Ave. S
New London OH 44851
419-929-7021 x315
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura
A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:52 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
What's the boot order in the BIOS on those machines?
Laura
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Albert Duro
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Ah, that brings up another interesting point. I use USB
external hard
drives too, and I've found that some WinXP and
Server2003 machines will not boot if a USB hard drive is
attached--I
have to remember to turn it off while booting.
Anyone else seen this?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies (was) Exchange
Log files
--Disk
Full--
No tape drives here. If it has a USB connection we are
in business.
Albert Duro wrote:
Yes, BE does do disk backup. But I have some objections:
A. They don't make it easy, infact they make an
unnecessarily
complicated production of it.
B. I started doing NTBackup to disk while (and because)
I was still
troubleshooting BE. When I gave up on BE and its
brethren, NTBackup
was a natural segway, and already in place and working.
C. I discovered one great advantage that
NTBackup-to-disk has over
any other backup system: with a bit of planning, it is
proof against
almost any combination of crash and burn. You have a
backup file on
two or more disks/machines. Things go bad, you can do
recovery from
any Windows machine; you can move or copy the backup
disks/files to
any machine. Try doing that with a sophisticated tape-
based
or
SAN-based system. Imagine having to replace the tape
drive/autoloader with the exact same type, while
rebuilding
a
same-hardware three-year old server to the exact same
configuration,
same SPs, same backup software, same drivers. I can
guarantee that
at least one of those necessary replacement elements will
be
impossible to find, even under leisurely conditions. [1]
Yes, there
are strategies to deal with that, but if you could spend
that kind of
money, you would have gotten a double-redundant
bullet-proof system in the first place.
I truly hope that I'm wrong out of lack of knowledge and
pessimism.
I am open to being corrected and encouraged.
[1] Naturally, the tape drive drivers will be on the same
tape that
you can't access nohow. Download the drivers from the
OEM, you say?
Chances are excellent that the OEM has gone out of
business, or sold
out to a giant who prunes out what they don't like (and
what you
need), or changed the name or version number on it out of
sheer
orneryness. If you do get to what looks like the right
drivers,
you're likely to find that the last minor upgrade version
that really
worked well for you has been dropped, or tweaked into
your trouble
zone. I can testify to ALL these experiences. I think
others can too.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Al Mulnick <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:27 PM
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies (was)
Exchange Log
files --Disk Full--
Trying to remember exactly, but doesn't BE have an
option to use
disk vs. tape drives?
You *could* run a test to help simplify and rule out
some of the
complexity. Could take a while, but might be worth it.
Al
On 11/2/06, *Albert Duro* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Why does NTBackup work for me and BE not, when
they are at
core the same product?
I wondered about that too. Here are my thoughts.
First, NTBackup is a simpler product that doesn't
get tangled
up with the complexities of scheduling and a GUI.
But the real reason, I think, is that I've been
doing
NTBackups to disk, while BE was to tape.
I've always suspected that most, if not all of my
difficulties
with BE had to do with the drivers for the tape
drives and
autoloaders, and with the SCSI interface to
other devices
('other' being anything beyond the normal HD and
CD
complement)
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Al Mulnick <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:11 AM
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange Log files
-
-
Disk
Full--
Well put Albert. Thanks for that feedback.
What still has me curious is why BE wouldn't
work in your
environment and why ntbackup does (partially
at least).
ntbackup as written by the same exact people and has a lot
of the same code (it's licensed by Microsoft
from Seagate
last I checked). Ntbackup is the less
featured version
designed for single host backups and extended
to act like
it does more.
So that said, I agree that the goal is that
your client's
data is backed up. I have to say that I
disagree that
jury-rigs, mickey mouse and by the seat of
your pants is
the long term solution though. That's an
infrastructure
component that will come back to haunt at some
point down
the road. As an interim fix, of course it can
work. I'm
not blinded by the big vendors to the point
that I think
they have the only solution. Far from it.
But I like to
think that I can at least share some
perspective
and
experience related to where it leads and I
definitely
favor technology over layer8 processes.
Why? Because
layer8 changes and grows out of current
positions and
foundational solutions should not have to be
decimated
when that happens. I've seen that way too
often to care
to see it continue where possible.
Basically, I hate to see a foundational
solution such as
backup, rely on such complexity and human
intervention. I
completely understand that you have to do what
you have to
do. When you wrote it in your original email,
it sounded
like you approved of that method. Reading
this last one,
I can you don't. I was just trying to point
out where
that leads and trying to understand how you go
there. I
bet I would have gotten there the same way
you did ;)
Best of luck getting that worked out.
If you need anything from me, please don't
hesitate. I
have been known to make some backup
solutions work :)
Feel free to ping off-line if I can be of any help.
On 10/31/06, *Albert Duro*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Al, since you ask, no I don't see it
differently, at
least not at the oratorical level. But
where the
rubber meets the road, things can look
very different.
Like the military say, the best laid plan
falls apart
the moment it meets the enemy. You
assume that I
monkey around with Ntbackup and balky
media
for
economic reasons. In fact, we spared no
expense
(relative to our small size) to put in
industrial-strength backup systems, both
software and
hardware. Even paid consultants to set
it up and
manage it.
It blew up in our faces. Primarily
because Backup
Exec just wouldn't work right in our
environment.
(I'm not saying that BE isn't a fine product, it would
just never work for us). Why not?
Don't know -- I
couldn't figure it out. Our
consultants couldn't
figure it out. Veritas support couldn't
either, nor
the autoloader manufacturer. For more
than two years,
nobody could figure it out, until I
decided to stop
throwing good money after bad.
Did I try alternative products? In the
same class,
yes -- more tales of woe, but different
reasons. We
did not nor are we going to buy the
high-end systems,
which cost more than our whole network is
worth.
So I was left with NTBackup, and
admittedly
a
little more gun-shyness about brand-name
backup
products than is strictly rational.
That's what I
have to work with, and I try to make the
best of it.
That's the 'real world' in my little corner of it.
Believe me, when you and joe and others on
this list
urge us to 'make the best', I listen, I
learn, and I
applaud. And it does push me in that
direction. But
the only path there goes through 'make
the best of
what you've got'. It's bumpy and often
barricaded.
But after all is said and done, the REAL
point is that
I am preserving my clients' data and
keeping them
happy. Jury-rigs, mickey mouse, and
by-the-pants not
withstanding.
-- Original Message -----
*From:* Al Mulnick
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Sent:* Sunday, October 29, 2006 4:30
AM
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange
Log files
--Disk Full--
sub-optimal media are part of the
real world?
Wow, thanks :)
Truth be told, that's a rant of mine.
I've heard
a lot (lately especially) about how we
want to do
things cheap and inexpensive and
we'll fix it
later and so on. I've also spent a
great deal of
time cleaning up that kind of stuff.
Unfortunately, once it escapes into the "real
world" then it becomes more difficult
to clean up
because you have to do so in front of
customers/clients.
Interesting approach though. Usually
a
less
disciplined from what I've seen and
often results
in more expense related to downtime
and
troubleshooting and lack of service.
I'm
interested if you see differently
though.
This area of the business fascinates
me....
On 10/28/06, *Albert Duro*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
I'm sure you and Susan are
right. All I'm
saying is that it *can* happen,
and for me,
why take the chance when
one-job/one-task is
easy to do.
Good point about the media, and
that
may
explain my case, but, hey,
sub-optimal media
situations are part of the real
world.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Al Mulnick
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:*
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 28,
2006 6:33 AM
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir]
Exchange Log
files --Disk Full--
I've not had that same
experience.
Granted, it's a limited feature utility
(note the use of the word
utility vs. tool
as requested) but it's still
capable of
doing more. There were
some fixes to
ntbackup in service packs and
such. You
might want to verify you're
using the
latest version of that's
what you see.
Also, check the media it's
headed to.
It's error handling is not very elegant,
but I've found it to be useful
and strong
enough to stand up to some
complex tasks
in the past. I've got several
running now
via cli that have been in
place for more
than half a year without issue
(I know, I
know, spend all that money on
an
enterprise backup system
only to backup
some machines locally. But
there are
times when it makes more
sense, trust me.)
-ajm
On 10/27/06, *Albert Duro*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I've found, with NTbackup,
that if you
cram two or more tasks
into a backup
job, it's very likely to
fail. For
example, if you do a
System State and
a file backup and an
Exchange backup
in the same job. It's
best
to
separate each task into
its own job,
and sort it out in the
scheduling.
A mixed job will also work
for a while
and then fail, which
sounds like what
happened to OP.
----- Original Message
--
---
*From:* Wells, James
Arthur
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:*
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Cc:* Technical
Support
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Sent:* Thursday,
October 26, 2006
2:21 PM
*Subject:* RE:
[ActiveDir]
Exchange Log files
--Disk Full--
Do you have multiple
information
stores on this
storage group?
(If using Exchange Enterprise
edition)...the logs
can't flush
until all stores have
a
full
backup, because the
logs
are
shared...
--James
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
----------
*From:*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
*On Behalf Of
*Technical Support
*Sent:* Thursday,
October 26, 2006
3:16 PM
*To:*
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>;
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Subject:* RE:
[ActiveDir]
Exchange Log files
--Disk Full--
Hi,
I am running Normal
Backup. Using
NTBackup Utility.
Backing
up
Information store.
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
----------
*From:*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on behalf of Missy
Koslosky
*Sent:* Thu
10/26/2006 12:49 PM
*To:*
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Subject:* RE:
[ActiveDir]
Exchange Log files
--Disk Full--
Are you running full
(AKA normal)
backups every night?
It seems not.
Use NTBackup to
backup to disk
(obviously, you'll
need a disk
with over 120GB of
available
space) and then use
whatever
normal program you
use to back
that backup onto tape.
This will
keep you running
until you sort
out why your normal
backup
software isn't
flushing the logs
when the backup
completes.
How are you
currently running
backups? What software
is in use?
Are you sure it's
Exchange aware?
Are you doing brick
level backups
or copy backups
instead of a full
backup? Neither will
flush the logs.
I'd resolve this as
quickly as
possible, because if
you are in a
situation where you
have to replay
the logs, you're NOT
going to be a
happy camper.
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
----------
*From:*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
*On Behalf Of
*Technical Support
*Sent:* Thursday,
October 26, 2006
11:09 AM
*To:*
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
*Subject:*
[ActiveDir] Exchange
Log files --Disk
Full--
Hi All,
Kindly suggest,
what i can do
about my Exchange Log
files?
I have about 120 GB
Log files for
past 4 months. I have
a few doubts:-
Do i really need all
those log
files?
If yes, Then how is it
possible to
manage with this as i
have a very
limited space left.
Can i delete these
log files?
Backup doesnt remove
these log files?
i am really running
out of space
on my Exchange log
storage drive.
*Thanks!!!*
Ravi
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
