RS, a couple of things: Women don't have egos.Every woman is an ego.Men,too,by the way.
Takes two to tango.When two egos tango and both want to lead... "Don't walk in front of me,I don't want to follow. Don't walk behind me,I don't want to lead. Walk beside me and just be my friend". Sorry about your bad (tragic?) experience. Learn from it. Self-inquiry...not women or girlfriend inquiry. When you have been married 29 years,like I have been,then tell me about marriage. And where did you get '99.9% of women don't care about enlightenment'? Off the top of your head or is that an actual number taken from some kind of survey? What about men? What's the percentage? I see a lot of men doing exactly what you describe women doing...good looking ones and ugly ones.Good looking or ugly doesn't seem to matter.Besides,good looking and ugly is in the eye of the beholder. Good luck in any future relationships. On Jul 26, 10:12 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > Kali, > > Everything is possible. I am just saying that its much easier to reach > enlightenment without a bitch beside you who screws up your mind. > Especially ones who go to parties, try control and manipulate you and tell > you what to do , what to wear, constantly nagging you, comparing you with > other men, running after other men, cheating on you, shopping all the time > -- all these things happen very normally. And most women don't give a shit > about enlightenment ie. 99.99 % of women. An ego is an ego and all women > have it. I have never been married but I have had a very destructive > girlfriend who was very good looking. Obviously you have to have an ugly > good hearted wife for a supportive relationship. I don't think I need an > ugly partner as I think it will destroy my life, unless I really fall in > love with her - which is not very probable. To be honest, I really have no > interest in women and try to be as far away from them as possible. Of > course, these are all just my thoughts. I may be married in a couple of > years. But at the moment I am just enjoying my bachelorhood at the age of > 30. > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mahakali <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi RS > > > has it ever occurred to you that, perhaps, the wife in question i.e. > > married to an enlightened man, might be of the supportive type rather > > than the non-supportive type? > > > If a guru's marriage does not work, is it fair to attribute that the > > fact he is enlightened? Or, is the guru - for example Eli (Gangaji's > > husband) - just another human being making human mistakes and faults? > > Are gurus allowed to be human or are they to be put on a pedestal? > > > Kali > > > On 26 Lug, 15:41, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It happened to me already. So you are still on the waiting list. And > > married > > > people can forget about it. > > > Marriage and enlightenment do not go together. UG had to leave his family > > > behind and live like a vagabond to reach enlightenment. > > > If you talk about things like enlightenment, your wife will kill you. > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Are you waiting for some kind of mystical sensation to confirm > > > > enlightenment happened? > > > > Can enlightenment happen without no associated special sensation? > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone- Nascondi testo citato > > > > - Mostra testo citato -
