On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:20 PM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > if everyone was perceiving from a universal conscious > point of view, then everyone would want to be productive > for the good of society, but this is not the case, > so opinions like "it's not fair that someone has more > than me, and I want the fairness-police to confiscate > some of their property and give it to me!" arise, without > any consideration that maybe that person works > 60 hrs a week, and you work much less or not at all! > where's the work-police making sure everyone > is productive? >
That is because "everyone" you talk about is still in the realm of "I am" or beingness. Beingness is a piece of shit and should be discarded by everyone But nobody is ready to do it becaue everyone is so greedy "to be". > if everyone sits around demanding that someone else > take care of them, who's going to do the work? > > On Mar 23, 4:23 am, "YouWho?" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you say so. > > > > I think the difference in our views is that I admit everything I say > > is not true, > > > > and it seems that you truly believe that what you say IS true. > > > > What you are saying is that you are a protector (of mine), and not > > surrendered to your own divinty (nothing's mine, all is thine). > > > > When Nisargadatta was asked about if he felt any resentment towards > > the British rule, he said, "If I take a rupee note and take it from > > this shirt pocket on the left side and put it into the shirt pocket on > > the right side, have I lost anything?" There is deep meaning in this. > > > > You think you have something to lose, that's the main point. With this > > thinking, you will always cling to the false sense of individuality. > > > > I have not ulterior motives in saying any of this to you.
